Rolling Stone in the '70s was, as it remains today, a TRADE PAPER, a record industry HYPE SHEET, a promulgator of mass compliance in the Consumer Sector, a principal factor in the dumbing, maiming, and calming down of the public's taste for a rock-roll beast that had once indeed been not only wild & crazy but GENUINELY ANARCHIC.
every year, this guy does this.
Well, he did it last year at the very least. It's a message worth repeating.I wanted to write a bit of a rebuttal/commentary for his speech but alas the day job was pretty hectic yesterday. I still might, ex post facto.
People keep telling me that this guy's making some good points and whatever, but no matter how many times I try to watch this thing I can't help thinking that this guy is just a massive fag.
Great, stupid Blogger double-posted me. Maybe the guy is right. Blogs suck.
Well, if you're going to double post something, it might as well have a homophobic slur.
A massive irritant?
Frankly, major music publications aren't and have never been better at exposing their readers to worthy music than blogs currently are.Eh, that's not quite true. Remember that publications devoted to rock/popular music only arose in the late 1960s -- I'm thinking particularly of Crawdaddy!, Bomp, and early RS. The methods of communication available at that time were not as sophisticated as what we've got now, and so they were doing a good job of exposing people to music and ideas. I wrote a paper for one of my courses about how these early publications were responsible for constructing the model of music journalism over the past and current century. Not much has changed, really.
Post a Comment
8 comments:
every year, this guy does this.
Well, he did it last year at the very least. It's a message worth repeating.
I wanted to write a bit of a rebuttal/commentary for his speech but alas the day job was pretty hectic yesterday. I still might, ex post facto.
People keep telling me that this guy's making some good points and whatever, but no matter how many times I try to watch this thing I can't help thinking that this guy is just a massive fag.
Great, stupid Blogger double-posted me. Maybe the guy is right. Blogs suck.
Well, if you're going to double post something, it might as well have a homophobic slur.
A massive irritant?
Frankly, major music publications aren't and have never been better at exposing their readers to worthy music than blogs currently are.
Eh, that's not quite true. Remember that publications devoted to rock/popular music only arose in the late 1960s -- I'm thinking particularly of Crawdaddy!, Bomp, and early RS. The methods of communication available at that time were not as sophisticated as what we've got now, and so they were doing a good job of exposing people to music and ideas. I wrote a paper for one of my courses about how these early publications were responsible for constructing the model of music journalism over the past and current century. Not much has changed, really.
Post a Comment